driverless cars
The reading passage and the lecture are both about driverless cars. From their contexts it can be stated that the discussion is mainly about if the advantages of them are real. While the author of the text claims that this new technology has positive impact in our daily lives, the lecturer completely refutes the arguments in the article. Hence, arguing that these explanations are faulty.
Firstly, it is said by lecturer that all computers softwares are prone to errors, since they are projected by human hands. For example, one of these autonomous cars hit another car last month. This directly contradicts the reading passage that denotes that driverless cars could reduce the accident numbers, as a result being much safer.
Secondly, the lecturer safely assumes that autonomous cars do not reduce overall pollution. This is because more people would be on road , including young and old people, which would lead to an increase in the number of cars. Therefore, even if they use more sustainable fuel resources, there would be an increase in pollution. This idea strongly contrasts with the article that mentions that this technology is environment friendly.
Finally, the lecturer believes that drive cars could be a relaxing time for drivers and a welcoming distraction. Using the autonomous cars, this extra time could be spent with work or just wasted. The text, on the other hand, states that driverless cars give to drivers extra time to be focused on other kind of activities such as reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... is because more people would be on road , including young and old people, which w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11290322581 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56378446017 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608870967742 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2880788408 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5714285714 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242108116448 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826701862368 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102594415962 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153716181898 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108031868226 0.0443174109184 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.