The author in the reading mentions several benefits of the driverless car in the market; in contrast, the lecturer disagrees and have a different opinion: there are several problems in the author's argument which should be considered because they cast doubts on the mentioned advantages.
First, the author states that the driverless cars are safer because human errors are the major concern for the crashes in the US. The software on which they run is more reliable and hence safer. The lecturer says that there is a problem with this argument by explaining that the software made for this driverless car are itself made by humans; therefore, there is still a chance a human error in this. Moreover, a recent accident has been in a news which was due to a driverless car.
Second, the author claims that these cars can communicate with other car through their software which makes them more efficient on roads by starting and stopping their engine less often; however, the professor refutes this claim: when the human is not driving a car, age will no longer be a criteria to travel through this autonomous car, and as a result more people will be driving the car and pollution will increase no matter how efficient they are.
Finally, the author asserts that these cars can save the time people spend on driving. Once again, the lecturer disagrees. She contends that people find listening to music while driving this car relaxing. If we take away that from them, then they will find one more place to work which they don't want to.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...nion: there are several problems in the authors argument which should be considered bec...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a criterion' or simply 'criteria'?
Suggestion: a criterion; criteria
...ot driving a car, age will no longer be a criteria to travel through this autonomous car, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... find one more place to work which they dont want to.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, then, therefore, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81509433962 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34477217831 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554716981132 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 122.507509974 49.2860985944 249% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 127.6 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364206519886 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144483737068 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111920654763 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212447364865 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833932829856 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.