ecocertified wood
The reading passage states that afford for ecocertified wood products are useless. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article American customers are exposed much advertising and they would not value or attention to ecocertification label. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that people don't treat with all the claims in the advertising and also American customers have reliable to the international organizations who started issuing to wood companies for prepare high ecological standards.
Second, the reading claims that ecocertified wood will be more expensive than uncertified wood. Admittedly, the professor in the lecture justifies the information presented in the reading and makes the point that American customers pay attention to cost of products if they want to compare two products with each other and actually they spend money for valuable products and quality is so important for them.
Tired, the author in the reading passage puts forward the idea that pursuing certification would not make sense for American wood companies because they sell their products to American people. In the same way, the speaker validate the idea and add that the companies can be sure about selling their products if gain certificate in competition with abroad products.
To sum up, both the writer and speaker hold conflicting views about ecocertified wood products. It is clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e idea and further explains that people dont treat with all the claims in the advert...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, second, so, in contrast, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8115428169 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559183673469 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.2406671389 49.2860985944 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239386039379 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126117613338 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164111789342 0.0662205650399 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156233707497 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832734882392 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.