Emperor penguins - Integrated section
There has been a ton of debate about the Emperor penguins . More specifically, regard to the feauteres of the specie. The writer points out three possible causes of the decline. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point out there are some flaws in the writer’s claim. In fact, the professor presents information that refutes each one of the writer’s arguments, which is addressed in details in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin, the reading section argues that emperor penguins remain faithful to their partner for life. In fact, they use vocal calls of different frequencies to contact each other. This specific claim is challenged by the lecturer. She stated that in some cases penguins have a partner per year, implying that only 50% of the penguins remains monogamous for life. This is due to the fact thee can’t always find their previous mate.
Moreover, the articles discusses the fact that every year they always return to the same rookery to nest. This special practice is used to form large colonies. New information stands in form opposition this claim. In the listening passage is explained that satellite images confirmed that in 6 instances penguins didn’t return to the same rookery. Instead, they relocated into a new colony. This is linked with the fact that in some cases penguins can’t find their previous mate.
Finally, they author wraps up this argument by posting that penguins are not endangered because the population is stable. In fact, they are not protected by any international law. Not surprisingly, the lecturer found some flaws in the previous argument, insomuch as the harsh environmental condition we are facing could melt the ice affecting the marine living as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ton of debate about the Emperor penguins . More specifically, regard to the feaute...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, well, in fact, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1554770318 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65049644828 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56183745583 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0774181552 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7894736842 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8947368421 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.89473684211 7.06452816374 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165756373639 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485534511249 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876236901858 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946494829153 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583182516848 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.