employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day
The reading and the lecture are both about offering employee the option to work four days instead of 5 day, like they usually do so far. Whereas the author of the reading states that it would be beneficial for the economy as a whole and for the employee who take 4 days as well, the professor suggests that it won´t bring those benefits that in the reading is stated. The lecture casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, companies’ profit should be increase because employee will feel more rested and alert, thus they won´t made a mistake while they are working. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He says that companies will spend more money since their will have to hire more workers and training them. Furthermore, he says that companies will have to buy more computers and built more offices.
Secondly, the reading states that unemployment rate would decrease as business could need more employee to take the time left for the workers who take the four days plan. Nevertheless, the lecturer refuses this argument. He argues that hiring a new worker would be more costly. In addition, he says that companies could offer to those employees work more hours to improve their salaries. By the way, the work environment would be unpleasant.
Finally, the reading claims that employees, who decided to take four days work, would get a better quality lives. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that getting a better life is in risk. He thinks that business won´t promote people who do not work five days, because they will need people full time to manager the work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increased'?
Suggestion: increased
...ading, companies' profit should be increase because employee will feel more rested ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more computers and built more offices. Secondly, the reading states that unempl...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te would decrease as business could need more employee to take the time left for ...
^^^
Line 13, column 302, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ive days, because they will need people full time to manager the work.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, while, in addition, by the way, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91958041958 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42454722846 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527972027972 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9676446277 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06452816374 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193980946342 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636469500853 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732152066606 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129592059832 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739530424595 0.0443174109184 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.