Essay topics: TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task
The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, through the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the time of the Roman colonization, the Middle Ages, up to the beginnings of the industrial age. Yet for most of the twentieth century, the science of archaeology,dedicated to uncovering and studying old cultural artifacts,was faced with serious problems and limitations in Britain.
First, many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects. The growth of Britain's population, especially from the 1950s on, spurred a lot of new construction in British cities, towns, and villages. While digging foundations for new buildings, the builders often uncovered archaeologically valuable sites.Usually, however, they proceeded with the construction and did not preserve the artifacts. Many archaeologically precious artifacts were therefore destroyed.
Second, many archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological research was inadequate. For most of the twentieth century, archaeology was funded mostly through government funds and grants, which allowed archaeologists to investigate a handful of the most important sites but which left hundreds of other interesting projects without support. Furthermore, changing government priorities brought about periodic reductions in funding.
Third, it was difficult to have a career in archaeology. Archaeology jobs were to be found at universities or with a few government agencies, but there were never many positions available. Many people who wanted to become archaeologists ended up pursuing other careers and contributing to archaeological research only as unpaid amateurs.
In this set of the materials, the reading discuss about the some problems that some archeaologist have passed in United Kindon, and prove three reasons of support. The Lecture passage opposes the reading. The professor in the lecture explain that 1999 have been some changes that emprove the carrer of archealogist, and refute each of the author reasons.
First, the author said that many of valuable artifacts were lost to construction project. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that actually, they have been doing much contractand make actions and plan to preserve the areas.
Second, the article posit that many archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological research was inadequate. The professor opposes saying that have been more company that have pay more for the archaeologist. Beside that, this have been made actions to preservation.
Third,the outhor claim that was difficult to have a career in archaeology. The professor doesn’t agree with this and says that the archaeologist has been payed very well, and have been encrease the number of professor that is graduated in archaeologist, beside that, the research have been published in scientific journal like article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...aterials, the reading discuss about the some problems that some archeaologist have p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...actand make actions and plan to preserve the areas. Second, the article posit ...
^^
Line 7, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... made actions to preservation. Third,the outhor claim that was difficult to have...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, second, so, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 191.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46073298429 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87189836602 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570680628272 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.103864614 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172976760075 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856680671698 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100436796137 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11448063069 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607299279256 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.