Essay topics: TPO 19 - Integrated TOEFL essay
Both the lecture and the passage comment buzzers who are recruited to advertise the product in diverse ways; actually, when companies encountered to the issue that people don't pay enough attention to their advertisement changed their methods. The article brings three hypothesized for revealing the claim that this method isn't logical; nonetheless, the lecturer puts all reasons under question. According to the speakers, none of those are convincing.
First, as the passage mentioned, companies are lying to people for increasing the rate of selling; however, the lecturer dismissed the claim by emphasizing that a person who is employed for introducing a commodity have tried that; in other words, managers of company find buyers who believe that their product is helpful; therefore, they tell the true. the man exemplifies his self. He works in a phone company where he has taken the advantages of its phone.
Next, the speaker declares that people who communicate with his ask many questions. If he doesn't answer to them they don't purchase the product; quite the opposite, the passage illustrates this as a negative point of the mentioned method.
Finally, as the text stated the society will be affected by buzzing adversely. Because people can't trust when they face people who are advertising and don't introduce themselves as a buzzer; moreover, they suggest not useful manufacture; however, the man refutes the idea by adding the fact that people can trust better when they see the direct conceptuses of their shopping.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...es encountered to the issue that people dont pay enough attention to their advertise...
^^^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...or revealing the claim that this method isnt logical; nonetheless, the lecturer puts...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eakers, none of those are convincing. First, as the passage mentioned, compani...
^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...helpful; therefore, they tell the true. the man exemplifies his self. He works in a...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as taken the advantages of its phone. Next, the speaker declares that people w...
^^^^
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...cate with his ask many questions. If he doesnt answer to them they dont purchase the p...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tions. If he doesnt answer to them they dont purchase the product; quite the opposit...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gative point of the mentioned method. Finally, as the text stated the society ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 95, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ed by buzzing adversely. Because people cant trust when they face people who are adv...
^^^^
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hey face people who are advertising and dont introduce themselves as a buzzer; moreo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29387755102 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71961728939 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624489795918 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 104.431029871 49.2860985944 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 129.7 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273515524602 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832306213001 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672173870712 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156035849323 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540771400001 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.