Ethanol fuel
The author of the reading passage thinks that the alternate gasoline, ethanol fuel, is not a good replacement for gasoline. The author provides three reasons to explain his viewpoint, the lecture speaker, however, casts doubt on them and counters them respectively.
As the writer points out, burning ethanol fuel would produce greenhouse gas just like gasoline, therefore, from the aspect of environment-friendly, it is not a good replacement. This argument failed to convince the lecture speaker. The lecture speaker claims that the main material for producing ethanol fuel is corn. When corns are growing, they consume carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, as a result, it actually reduces greenhouse gas in the atmosphere.
Another point given in the reading passage is that the main food resource of farm animals would be reduced if corns have been taken to produce ethanol fuel. The lecturer, again, disputes this statement and argues that ethanol fuel is made of the cell wall of plants, in other words, they are not necessary to use the food of farm animals. People could just grow any other plants to replace corns as a material of ethanol fuel.
Lastly, the reading passage suggests that ethanol fuel is too expensive so that it would not be able to compete with gasoline. This suggestion, again, counters by the lecturer. The lecturer thinks that when the production of ethanol fuel goes higher, the cost of it would go down accordingly. He also provides a report claiming that if the production of ethanol fuel goes up to three times higher than it is now, the price could be cut down 40%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, however, if, lastly, so, therefore, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99626865672 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69075906381 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533582089552 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0410387771 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45739142915 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18413019721 0.0996497079465 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126563251431 0.0662205650399 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292418624286 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838135130608 0.0443174109184 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.