explain how lecture cast doubt upon points made in the lecture about Rambrandt paintings.
The reading and the lecture was both about one of Rembrandt painting. The author of the reading believes that the painting could not be a work by Rembrandt. The lecture shed lights on these claims made in the article to clear the misconception. She thinks that it originally work of Rembrandt and she gives certain claims for her rebuttal.
First of all, the author claims the inconsistency about the way the woman in the portrait has worn a fur collar that is giving a contrast as other clothes are like the servant. The point is cleared by the lecturer. She says that after meticulous x-rays examination it was found out that the collar added after 100 of years by someone else to make the painting more expensive and after removing the paint it can be seen that it is work of the painter.
Secondly, the author believes that there is the problem in light and shadow as Rembrandt was meticulous in it so due to faults in the painting it could not be work of Rembrandt. But the lecturer opposes it. She claims that it was due to the other painter who painted over the work of Rembrandt. Furthermore, she points out that when the fur collar was removed then one can see that the woman is wearing a light collar that reflects the light rather absorb and could be creating a shadow effect.
Third, the author states that the painting reveals that it was colored on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together which proved that it was not Rembrandt work. The lecturer challenged this point. She claims that after study it was found that someone else used wooden pieces to make it more valuable. She elaborates on this by mentioning that the single wood panel that was found after removing other glued one is that the wood is of the same tree that he used in other famous painting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nting could not be a work by Rembrandt. The lecture shed lights on these claims mad...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, second, secondly, so, then, third, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54012345679 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34453147694 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429012345679 0.540411800872 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3935814607 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0666666667 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0956556474165 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629811969575 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835171706595 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690672691869 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359758622816 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 12.2367328918 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.42419426049 81% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.