Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions presented in the reading passage.
Both the reading, and the professor, are discussing about the utilizing one of the three ways for the survival of Torreya taxifolia plants which are about to extinct. The reading suggest that any of these three efforts can be successful. However, the professor cast doubt upon them and refutes each of reading’s points.
First of all, the professor explains that reestablishing of Torreya in north of Florida where they were in abundance, would not be successful because these areas are strongly affected by changes in climate either because of global warming or the wetland through out Florida have been drained causing the area more dryer. Therefore, Torreya would not be able to survive because of the un availability of microclimate condition. This opposes the reading which states that Torreya would be survived by reestablishing them in cool and damp areas of microclimate where they were in large quantity before.
Second, the professor mentioned that planting Torreya seeds to an entirely different location away from its microclimate will not work. He explained this by giving an example of another plant named Black Locust. He said that humans moved that plant to the north in a new environment for its survival and it spread very fast and killed and killed other plants in that environment which were already in danger of extinction. This contradicts reading which claims that planting Torreya seeds in a totally new environment will be helpful for its survival.
Finally, the professor disagrees with the reading’s suggestion of planting Torreya seeds in research centers where scientists can protect and do research to avoid its extinction. The professor opposes this by saying that research centers will not be able to provide large and genetically diverse environment which Torreya needs in order to resist diseases in a long term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...which are about to extinct. The reading suggest that any of these three efforts can be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...ecause of global warming or the wetland through out Florida have been drained causing the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lobal warming or the wetland through out Florida have been drained causing the ar...
^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'dryer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: dryer
...rida have been drained causing the area more dryer. Therefore, Torreya would not be able t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...states that Torreya would be survived by reestablishing them in cool and damp are...
^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t which Torreya needs in order to resist diseases in a long term.
^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der to resist diseases in a long term.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27516778523 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79223669115 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513422818792 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8541634684 49.2860985944 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103537461938 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477526020683 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395050485499 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067279252582 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315228149153 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.