Finding contrast
In the lecture, speaker discussed altruism in totally a different way than that has been explained in the reading passage. The reading passage describes altruism as a act of devoid of selfishness. But the speaker urges that there is something non-materialistic things lies in this activity. And these acts infer to meet one's self interest that can be valuable to someone.
The lecturer told that Meer Kat eat food before it makes a stand guard for his group. Thus, the sentinel meerkat is not acting with empty stomach at all. On the other hand, the passage denies this fact. It indicates that the sentinel meerkat is not bothered about his own eating. It prefers to think about other safety first.
The passage states that meerkat creates an alarm sound when any predator comes to its notice to alert the other group member. But the speaker argues that it does this act to make its escape first by divert the predators' notice to the other members.
Also, in human altruism case- the speaker makes a contrast by telling that when a human donates a body organ even to a strange person, he gets appreciation from society. Furthermore, he creates a positive self-image that is also valuable and one can't deny the fact that as no materialistic rewards are related here, it is fully selfishness act.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e reading passage describes altruism as a act of devoid of selfishness. But the s...
^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...elf-image that is also valuable and one cant deny the fact that as no materialistic ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8125 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54418855594 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629464285714 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8005381903 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9230769231 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2307692308 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0252672808935 0.272083759551 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00668832455241 0.0996497079465 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0231690358846 0.0662205650399 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0151215593571 0.162205337803 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261913090961 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.