First, no fossil remains of actual bees have ever been found that date to 200 million
years ago. The earliest preserved body of a bee is 100 million years old—only half as
old as the fossilized structures discovered in
Arizona.
Absence of Flowering Plants
A second reason to doubt that bees existed 200 million years ago is the absence of
flowering plants in that period. Today's bees feed almost exclusively on the flowers of
flowering plants; in fact, bees and flowering plants have evoKted a close, mutually
dependent biological relationship. Flowering plants, however, first appeared on Earth 125
million years ago. Given the bees' close association with flowering plants, it is unlikely
bees could have existed before that time.
Structures Lack Some Details
Third, while the fossilized structures found in Arizona are somewhat similar to nest
chambers made by modern bees, they lack some of the finer details of bees' nests. For
example, chambers of modern bee nests are closed by caps that have a spiral pattern,
but the fossilized chambers lack such caps. That suggests the fossilized structures were
made by other insects, such as wood -boring beetles
The article states that bees were not exist 200 million years ago and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that bees used to live in the earth 200 million years ago and refutes each of aurthur's reason.
First, the reading claims that no fossils have been found that date 200 million years ago, the professor refutes this point by saying that bees fossil require special kinds of rezine which must be produced by specific kind of tree to be preserved. the absence of bees fossils just demonstrate inappropirate kind of tree rezine.
Second, the article posits that bees have mutual relationship with flowers, in fact bees life is relies on folwers. Furthermore, the absence of flower plants conforms that, there couldn't exist any bees in that period. the professor says that bees were independent on flowers and uses different materials like, pine trees to feed themselves.
Third, the reading announced that fossilized structures found in Arizona lacks finer details of bees nests. The professor opposes that point by explaining existence of some kind of waterproofing material in the fossil nests, which is similar to waterproofing material in bees nests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
The article states that bees were not exist 200 million years ago and provides thre...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bees'' or 'bee's'?
Suggestion: bees'; bee's
...essor refutes this point by saying that bees fossil require special kinds of rezine ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... specific kind of tree to be preserved. the absence of bees fossils just demonstrat...
^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...e of flower plants conforms that, there couldnt exist any bees in that period. the prof...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... couldnt exist any bees in that period. the professor says that bees were independe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 192.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.203125 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54882338561 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7516724547 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322399502039 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13727538611 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601988021085 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191688659638 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05348089031 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.