the fossils of bees founded in million years ago
The text and the lecture both explain the possibility of presence of bees in 200 million years ago. As the text, it is impossible that bees existed since that time and provides three reasons of support. On the other hand, the professor refutes these reasons and explains why she is against them.
First, the text explains that there is no fossil of bees related to 200 million years ago, and it can proved that bees appeared just 100 million years ago. The professor goes against this point and states that although there is not any fossil of bees dated to 200 million years ago, it may be just because they could not be preserved from that time. She adds that current fossils belong to 100 years ago are made of sticky liquid of special kind of trees, and because these trees were rare in the past, they could not preserve any bees as fossils in themselves.
Second, as the text, another reasons which proves bees did not exist 200 million years ago is the lack of flowering plants in that period which bees heavily relied on them. The professor refutes this claim and states that it is probable that bees in 200 million years ago, used non-flowering plants like pine trees as their food resource and just later, adapted to flowering plants.
Third, the text claims that the fossils found in Arizona do not have a special structure detail of bees' nests. It also states that this lack can prove that founded fossils belong to other kind of insects. The professor rejects this point by stating that there are some chemical evidences which prove founded fossils belong to bees. She continues that by doing chemical analyzes, scientists found that there is a special water-proof component in founded fossils which is present in modern bees as well. In this way she states that founded fossils belong to bees dated to 200 million years ago.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | saamaan | 86 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | YasamanEsml | 86 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Liu160502 | 90 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | reza_fattahi | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and ex 73
- students by helping primary school students to read and do mathematics want to help others. 73
- high school students should be required to have three years of studying a foreign language 77
- because modern life is complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- Do you agree whit spending money on space or prefer we spend that money for the earth? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'prove'
Suggestion: prove
...ed to 200 million years ago, and it can proved that bees appeared just 100 million yea...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y could not preserve any bees as fossils in themselves. Second, as the text, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, may, second, so, third, well, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71517027864 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1496013972 2.5805825403 83% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433436532508 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.788127125 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.153846154 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.582467505307 0.272083759551 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.245519000715 0.0996497079465 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155538386169 0.0662205650399 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360372494568 0.162205337803 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115907292189 0.0443174109184 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.