frog population
Nowadays, the frog’s population threatened because of human biotic disease, and the problems of inhabitants. The author poses some reason to describe the problems and solutions to overcome this predicament.
Firstly, the reading materials point out that agriculture pesticides for controlling weeds caused to destroy of the frog population in their habitats. The author poses in order to survive frogs declining of consuming pesticides is more efficient. Conversely, the farmers opposed to reducing pesticides because of the increase of pest, growing weeds that resulted in decreasing crop production.
Secondly, one of the bacterial that decreased frog population are fungus. This infectious factor caused to increase in the thickness of the frog’s skin which consequently dehydration of the frog’s body. The author suggested individually injection can control of the disease. The speaker states that this controlling method is very difficult and expensive for users and also it is not effective for the next generations.
The last but not least, in the essay suggested that the water resource of frog’s habitats in endangered because of excessive consuming water in the frog’s ecosystem. The author posed that should pay attention to water resources in frogs in order to keep moisture in the surface to alive. the professor contracted by the author due to climate change and shortage of water in recent decades.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: increasing
...e fungus. This infectious factor caused to increase in the thickness of the frog's ski...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... effective for the next generations. The last but not least, in the essay sugges...
^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ing water in the frog's ecosystem. The author posed that should pay attention ...
^^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... keep moisture in the surface to alive. the professor contracted by the author due ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61187214612 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01445265232 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547945205479 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.164438423 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.416666667 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356645634503 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134861776238 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13618627673 0.0662205650399 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217502867045 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410214705942 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.