Fuel-cell engine over internal-combation engin
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about whether it is a good idea to use a fuel-cell engine to substitute internal-combustion one. The author strongly postulates that fuel-cell engine has several benefits, on the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that there are several counterarguments to this view.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, the internal-combustion engine heavily depends on petroleum which is not a renewable resource. On the other hand, the alternative choice uses natural gas and water. The writer further points out that it is not readily run out and accessible to anyone. Nonetheless, the lecture offsets these points by declaring that although the author's some of the points are true, using water is not as easy as the author thinks. this is mainly due to the fact that it uses pure liquid water which is made by a highly artificial cold environment. Therefore, she asserts that using a fuel-cell engine is not practical and easy to store.
Secondly, the professor in the lecture further says that using this engine is not solve the environmental issues associated with pollution. Furthermore, she explains that it has to be purified that means it requires a ton of energy to produce it. Consequently, the manufactories will create a great amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere to emerge it even if the automobile doesn't contribute to pollution. These claims refute the writer's implications about it will resolve the pollution's problems easily because it only uses water instead.
The article lastly insists that utilising fuel-cell engine is cheaper than other replacement on account of its efficiency of fuel energy. The speaker in the listening counters these indications by pointing out that creating this energy is expensive because it requires a rare material which is an essential part of its production. It goes without saying that it can't undergo chemical reaction without this material. Additionally, she explains that other cheaper material tried to replace this integral material, but it grounded nothing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... by declaring that although the authors some of the points are true, using water is not as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...er is not as easy as the author thinks. this is mainly due to the fact that it uses ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'solved'.
Suggestion: solved
...ther says that using this engine is not solve the environmental issues associated wit...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ere to emerge it even if the automobile doesnt contribute to pollution. These claims r...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...duction. It goes without saying that it cant undergo chemical reaction without this ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, lastly, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32934131737 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03731558371 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544910179641 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7296707933 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233900404918 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801345108177 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110789512075 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157659145004 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100202663908 0.0443174109184 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.