Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, grow faster, or withstand adverse conditions. Planting genetically modified trees on a large scale promises to bring a number of benefits.
First, genetically modified trees are designed to be harder than natural trees; that is, they are more likely to survive than their unmodified counterparts. In Hawaii, for example, a new pest-resistant species of papaya trees has been developed in response to ring spot virus infections that have repeatedly damaged the native papaya tree population. Planting the genetically modified papayas has largely put an end to the ring spot problem.
Both the article and the lecture are about the Genetic Modified Trees (GMTs) and pluses and minuses of them. While the article states that GMTs has many advantageses not only for palnts but also for people who grow them, the professor, on the other hand, rebuts those notion and opposes the author's reasons.
First, the reading materials posits that GMTs are harder to natural disasters like harsh climate and pests, then they survive longer than the native spicies. It mentions an example of papya tree which has been changed genetically to be resistant to ring spot virus and now this viral disease wiped out from Hawaii. Conversely, the lecturer challenges this advantage by asserting that those GMTs are only resistant to a limited conditin or pest, and they can not tolerate all different climatic chalenges or new pest attack. Since the native population of trees have more genetic diversity they always have some individuals that theycan tolerate different disasters and survive longer.
Second, the article states that GMTs produce more friuts and grow faster, hence, the farmers and caregivers benefit more. They even save money on pesticide usage. The professor, however, refutes this idea by explaining that thsoe GMTs have a hidden cost that makes this cultivating practice less profitable. Farmers should pay for the GMTs' seed every year because they cannot collect those GMTs' seed and used them again. It is forbiden by law.
Third, the author avers that GMTs grow faster than native species; then, they could decrease the overexploitation of the forest. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes this concept by explaining that GMTs damage the natural forest as they grow faster, they compete with the natural trees for resources such as sunlight, soil, and water. In this competition, the native plants defeat and the GMTs overrun them. Then they will destroy the valuabble, native specieses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this notion' or 'those notions'?
Suggestion: this notion; those notions
...he professor, on the other hand, rebuts those notion and opposes the authors reasons. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion and opposes the authors reasons. First, the reading materials posits that...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fferent disasters and survive longer. Second, the article states that GMTs pro...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed them again. It is forbiden by law. Third, the author avers that GMTs grow f...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or resources such as sunlight, soil, and water. In this competition, the native p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, second, so, then, third, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15483870968 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36255034247 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590322580645 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1149328596 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.533333333 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133860148992 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469960698583 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535136038823 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810534815595 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019727810391 0.0443174109184 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.