In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the availability of organic foods. Organic' foods are regulated by the government; thus in order to officially be termed "organic", they must be grown without pesticides or artificial fertilizers. In just a short time, it has become overwhelmingly clear that consuming only organic fruits and vegetables has a number of benefits.
First, organic foods have been shown to have a positive impact on human health. Most foods are grown using many chemicals, some of which eventually end up being consumed by people. Research has proven that eating chemical additives harms humans over time. For example, a recent study linked the consumption of artificial additives found in non-organic foods to behavioral disorders in children. However, since organic foods are grown without pesticides, people do not have to worry about unexpected side effects from eating chemicals.
Next, organic foods also benefit the environment. Traditional farming techniques dump hundreds of pesticides into the ground every year. Additionally, chemicals used in farming remain in the ground for many years afterwards. Organic foods, on the other hand, do not use any harmful pesticides or fertilizers. As a result, there are fewer pollutants entering the Earth's land and water systems.
Finally, the consumption of organic foods also benefits small farmers. Most of the world's food supply is produced and sold by large corporations. This makes it very difficult for small farmers to compete. However, the majority of organic foods are grown on family farms. Buying more organic food means that small farmers are able to make a living off of farming.
The lecture states that organic foods such as organic fruits and vegetables have a number of benefits for people, and provides three reasins of support. However, the professor challenges all these reasons and asserts that though organic foods have become popular, there is a missconception about them. Then, he rejects all of the athor's reasons.
First, the reading material avers that orgainc foods,which don't include pesticide or chemical fertilizers, have a wonderful effect on human health. It says an example of a resarch about bad effect of non-organic food on behavioral disorders in children. Conversely, the professor believes that faemers use bio-pesticide such as rotenent insteade of chemical pesticide. He posits that this plant-derviative pesticide has bad effect as much as chemical pesticides. As an example it cause a pancratic disease in human. Then, it is only a miss-information about the organic food which they do not have side effects.
Second, the author mentions that orgainc food benefits environment because farmers do not add chemical amterials like as pesticide or chemical fertilizers into ground when they are producing them. Nonetheless, the lecturer opposes this idea by explaining that farms where used to produce organic food have lower yields at least 20 percent. Therefore, to produce the same amount of food, farmers need more land. The more land they need, the more forest should be clear cut. He absoluetly disagree that the harm of chemical fertilizers are more than forests clear cut.
Third, the lecture points out that buying organic food is a supporting practice to help family farmers, since only the small farms are producing those organic fruits and vegetables. Controversially, the professor said that since thsoe organic foods have become popular, big companies and corporations are producing these kinds. He refers the students to look at the organic labels on the foods next time they go shoping. In overall the professor asserts that the organic food practice does not have each of the benefits which the author mentions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...conception about them. Then, he rejects all of the athors reasons. First, the read...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he rejects all of the athors reasons. First, the reading material avers that o...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...eading material avers that orgainc foods,which dont include pesticide or chemical fert...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...material avers that orgainc foods,which dont include pesticide or chemical fertilize...
^^^^
Line 2, column 470, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... effect as much as chemical pesticides. As an example it cause a pancratic disease...
^^
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...s chemical pesticides. As an example it cause a pancratic disease in human. Then, it ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d which they do not have side effects. Second, the author mentions that orgainc...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zers are more than forests clear cut. Third, the lecture points out that buyin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, look, nonetheless, second, so, then, therefore, third, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31610942249 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80837247519 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547112462006 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2990529036 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1666666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272245598711 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889423845896 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596360510331 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174993033676 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418368374953 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.