In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the availability of organic foods. Organic' foods are regulated by the government; thus in order to officially be termed "organic", they must be grown without pesticides or artificial fertilizers. In just a short time, it has become overwhelmingly clear that consuming only organic fruits and vegetables has a number of benefits.
First, organic foods have been shown to have a positive impact on human health. Most foods are grown using many chemicals, some of which eventually end up being consumed by people. Research has proven that eating chemical additives harms humans over time. For example, a recent study linked the consumption of artificial additives found in non-organic foods to behavioral disorders in children. However, since organic foods are grown without pesticides, people do not have to worry about unexpected side effects from eating chemicals.
Next, organic foods also benefit the environment. Traditional farming techniques dump hundreds of pesticides into the ground every year. Additionally, chemicals used in farming remain in the ground for many years afterwards. Organic foods, on the other hand, do not use any harmful pesticides or fertilizers. As a result, there are fewer pollutants entering the Earth's land and water systems.
Finally, the consumption of organic foods also benefits small farmers. Most of the world's food supply is produced and sold by large corporations. This makes it very difficult for small farmers to compete. However, the majority of organic foods are grown on family farms. Buying more organic food means that small farmers are able to make a living off of farming.
Both the essay and the lecture talk about the pros and cons of organic foods. While the author mentions three benefits of organic products for human and environment, the lecturer repudiates those theories and states benefits of organic foods are a misconception, then he opposes all the reasons were explained in the essay.
First, the professor asserts that this idea that roganic foods do not contain hazardous chemical like ordinary non-organic foods, is not correct. He adds that organic food producers use a natural chemical, named rottenen, which has a very detrimental effedct on children. Recent researchs showed that there is a connection between rottenen and disease in children, he said. He believes that counsumers should know about these facts. Therefore, this note that organic foods improve the overall health of consomers is rejected by the professor.
Second, the lecturer posits that in accordance to the benefits of organic production practice for envirtonment, we should consider that this practice has 20 percent less yield rether than conventional agriculture method. To compensate this, organic producers will use more land, which it ends up cutting down forest. In addition it will led to less diversity of animals and plants species. He insists that just becuase of less using some pesticides and fertilizers, we should not ignore these detrimental impacts of organic food production on environment. As we see, the writer's idea about the benefits of organic foods for the environment does not hold water.
Third, the speaker points out that since organic foods have become popular and omnipresence, many big companies have involved in this field. Nowadays, many of big producers sell their organic goods through thier companies' branches. He wanted students to pay attention to the labels of organic foods next time they buy. With this explanaion, the professor rebuts this idea that buying organic foods will help small corporations or family run farms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reasons were explained in the essay. First, the professor asserts that this i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsomers is rejected by the professor. Second, the lecturer posits that in acco...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...hich it ends up cutting down forest. In addition it will led to less diversity of animal...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...utting down forest. In addition it will led to less diversity of animals and plants...
^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...oduction on environment. As we see, the writers idea about the benefits of organic food...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the environment does not hold water. Third, the speaker points out that since...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, then, therefore, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33226837061 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6878714062 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607028753994 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.049975025 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3125 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262326921935 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946229507855 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511863019543 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169315539625 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161199874934 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.