When you give money to charitable organizations, do you prefer to choose how the donation will be used (for example, donate money on food or service or advertisement for organizations) or leave the decision to the organizations?
We are all humans as one of the weakest animal in the world as individuals, but when we are togather we are one of the strongest. Being togather and helping each other in peace flourish our talents and abilities. Charities are organizations through which we see this helpind hand and humanitarian environemnt. While some people like to define who their help are used, others do not take care about the way that their helps are used. In my opinion, the help is beautiful by itself, it does not matter that charity organization who spend our charities. In the following essay I will delve into this in more details.
First, charity and helping others are based on trust, and I believe that those organization are familiar with the situation better than me. Hence, I firmely trust them that they make the best decision when it comes to way of using our charities. There are several charity organizations in my neighberhood which they are active in different fields. They announced their interset in thier manifests. Then when we eagerly give them some money or other charity, we know somewhat that in mormal condition hwo and where those will be used. For example, I interested to help people who are homless and they need a shelter and cloths. Even thought this Fraternity Organization Charity works in other fields like providing medication for some elderly who are in houses, I eagerly help them wothout doubt and I am sure that they are not only able to achieve my goal to help homeless but also they are cautious about thier aims and their appraoch. As a result, when ever I make a charity, I am confident that they do the best choice.
Second, There are many emergency situations in which chariy organizations change their priorities to deal with the unprecedented conditions. It will be very useful and practical if they have the authority to amend the why they spend people's charity. For instance, some times an unparalleled disaster such as hurican or earthquack or flood affect million of people's life, and in this situation all the charity organizations should help people to deal with this life-threating circumstances. Having the right to change the way they spend folk's charity is useful. I read a news about the importance of these helping hand in the last huricane in New Orlando. This report named all the charity organization were active to assist people in that condition. Seeing the name of different organizations which they established to help animals, environment, or space exploraition was so exciting and proved that they are helpful in those conditions.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that helping to charity organizations wothout and limitation is so better rather than limit them to spend in specific way. It is because they know the needy people better us and because in emergency situation which a lot of people are in a critical condition those organizations will be more practical in helping people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
We are all humans as one of the weakest ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will delve into this in more details. First, charity and helping others are ba...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this organization' or 'those organizations'?
Suggestion: this organization; those organizations
... are based on trust, and I believe that those organization are familiar with the situation better ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 581, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...or example, I interested to help people who are homless and they need a shelter and clo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nfident that they do the best choice. Second, There are many emergency situati...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'why'?
Suggestion: why
...cal if they have the authority to amend the why they spend peoples charity. For instanc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...s hurican or earthquack or flood affect million of peoples life, and in this situation ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons should help people to deal with this life-threating circumstances. Having the...
^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...y spend folks charity is useful. I read a news about the importance of these helping h...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they are helpful in those conditions. In conclusion, I strongly believe that h...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 72.0 43.0788530466 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2441.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93131313131 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79204051835 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472727272727 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 782.1 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.618758006 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.130434783 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5217391304 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69565217391 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160054488114 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524451174899 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297108610745 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108967058352 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255700723148 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.