When you give money to charitable organizations, do you prefer to choose how the donation will be used (for example, donate money on food or service or advertisement for organizations) or leave the decision to the organizations?
We are all humans as one of the weakest animal in the world as individuals, but when together we are one of the strongest. Being togather and helping each other in peace flourish our talents and abilities. Charities are organizations through which we see this helping hand and humanitarian environment. While some people like to define how their help is used, others do not take care about this. In my opinion, the help is beautiful by itself; it does not matter that charity organizations how spend our charities. In the following essay, I will delve into this in more details.
First, charity and helping others are based on trust, and I believe that those organizations are familiar with the situation better than me. Hence, I firmly trust them they make the best decision when it comes to the way of using our charities. There are several charity organizations in my neighborhood which they are active in different fields. They announced their interest in their manifests. Then when we eagerly give them some money or other charity, we know somewhat that in normal condition how and where those will be used. For example, I interested to help people who are homeless and they need a shelter and cloths. Even thought the Fraternity Organization Charity works in other fields like providing medication for some elderly who are in their houses, I eagerly help them without doubt, and I am sure that they are not only able to achieve my goal to help homeless but also they are cautious about their aims and their approach. As a result, whenever I make a charity, I am confident that they do the best choice.
Second, there are many emergency situations in which charity organizations change their priorities to deal with the unprecedented conditions. It will be very useful and practical if they have the authority to amend the why they spend people’s charities. For instance, sometimes unparalleled disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, and floods affect million of people’s life. In this situation all the charity organizations should help people to deal with this life-threating circumstances. Having the right to change the way they spend folk’s charities is useful. I read news about the importance of these helping hands in the last hurricane in New Orlando. This report named all the charity organizations were active to assist people in that condition. Seeing the name of different organizations which they established to help animals, environment, or space exploration was so exciting and proved that they are helpful in those conditions if they have this flexibility in spending charities.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that helping to charity organizations without any limitation is much better rather than limit them to spend in a specific way. It is because they know the needy people better than us and because in an emergency which many people are in a critical condition, those organizations will be more practical in helping people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll delve into this in more details. First, charity and helping others are ba...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ident that they do the best choice. Second, there are many emergency situati...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'why'?
Suggestion: why
...cal if they have the authority to amend the why they spend people’s charities. For inst...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ricanes, earthquakes, and floods affect million of people’s life. In this situation all...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s flexibility in spending charities. In conclusion, I strongly believe that h...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a specific way" with adverb for "specific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... better rather than limit them to spend in a specific way. It is because they know the needy peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 43.0788530466 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2485.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88412983664 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481632653061 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 785.7 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6127040856 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.541666667 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45833333333 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162989229348 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532263616835 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314342144192 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110831787918 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205016312672 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.