Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window

Essay topics:

Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows There are, however, several solutions that responsible businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds.

One-Way Glass

One solution is to replace the regular, clear glass with one-way glass that is transparent in only one direction. The occupants of the building can see out, but birds and others cannot see in. If birds cannot see through a window, they will understand that the glass forms a solid barrier and will not try to fly through it.

Colorful Designs

A second solution is to paint colorful lines or other designs on regular window glass. For example, a window could have a design of thin stripes painted over the glass. People would still be able to see through the openings in the design where there is no paint, while birds would see the stripes and thus avoid trying to fly through the glass Architects can be encouraged to include colorful painted patterns on glass as part of the general design of buildings.

Magnetic Field

The third solution is to create an artificial magnetic held to guide birds away from buildings. Humans use an instrument called a magnetic compass to determine directions-either north, south, east, or west. Bird research has shown that birds have a natural ability to sense Earth’s magnetic fields; this ability works just like a compass, and it helps birds navigate in the right direction when they fly. A building in a bird flight path can be equipped with powerful electromagnets that emit magnetic signals that steer birds in a direction away from the building.

The reading claims that birds researcher have proved that birds can not distinct windows of building and imagine it an open air and fly in to them so it cause them to be damaged so there are three solutions that engineers can do to prevent this accident.However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and present some evidence to refute them all.
The author argues that these usual windows should be replaced by on-way windows that means windows whit just one direct and reflect the sun luminous and birds an not see inside and see it a wall.Conversely, the lecturer brings up the ideas that by reflecting bright windows will be like a mirror that is a bad choice for birds because they can see sky or trees in it and fly right in which will not have good consequences for them.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that by colorful designing the glasses birds will distinguish it as another thing so do not go to it.On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that by painting on the glasses birds will perceive the lights through their lines and see them as a holes so fly to them in addition these designs make the house dark and small that is not interesting for people who live there.
Finally, the reading asserts that another way to protect birds to be injuries is providing a magnetic field to misleading them from their main line this id because of their ability to sense Earth's magnetic fields.In contrast, the speaker dismiss this issue due to the fact that we know birds use their inherent talent just for traveling in lone distance like migrating from cold countries to a warm one to figure out exact line and they do not use it for shorter ways between cities and for these their eyes can have effect results for them.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...it an open air and fly in to them so it cause them to be damaged so there are three s...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...gineers can do to prevent this accident.However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubio...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... and reflect the sun luminous and birds an not see inside and see it a wall.Conver...
^^
Line 2, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Conversely
...rds an not see inside and see it a wall.Conversely, the lecturer brings up the ideas that ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
... it as another thing so do not go to it.On the contrary, the professor underlines ...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a hole' or simply 'holes'?
Suggestion: a hole; holes
...hts through their lines and see them as a holes so fly to them in addition these design...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because of their ability to sense Earths magnetic fields.In contrast, the speaker...
^^
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...bility to sense Earths magnetic fields.In contrast, the speaker dismiss this issu...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, furthermore, however, so, another thing, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60191082803 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43668037584 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 78.0 21.2450331126 367% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7113527738 49.2860985944 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 361.25 110.228320801 328% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 78.5 21.698381199 362% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 25.75 7.06452816374 364% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197187213329 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116416725946 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269019105749 0.0662205650399 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116416725946 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269019105749 0.0443174109184 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 39.5 13.3589403974 296% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 9.23 53.8541721854 17% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 31.3 11.0289183223 284% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.58 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.42419426049 123% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.7273730684 247% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 33.2 10.498013245 316% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.