The reading and lecture are both about the birds prevention from getting injured through the glass of the window, whereas the author gives the three solutions in order to prevent the injuries of the bird by the glass window. The lecture casts doubts on those three solutions given by the author by claiming that all those methods are useless.
At first, the author of the reading states the ideas about the replacement of the regular glass with the one-way glass, doing this will let the people see outside in one way and birds cannot see through it, as a result bird will not get trapped in the buildings. However, the lecture posits that this idea is not a proper solution as the one-way glass reflects the light, and birds will not understand it that they are just reflections. He also says that due to the false representation of reflection, birds will resemblance the reflection as the sky or the tree and will fly over the window.
Admittedly, the author coins a new way to help birds from getting harm by formulating the colorful design, which will have a stripe on it and birds will see just stripes not the window. In contrary, the speaker refutes author's ideas as he thought it is also not a good idea as he thinks that the stripes of the window might refer fallacy to birds. He thoughts that the birds could falsely see the stripes as the small holes and might get into it. Moreover, the lecturer adds new idea that unpainted part should be small but he also disagree with this idea as he thinks making a small hole will make the room dark of the buildings.
Finally, the author claims that magnetic field might help bird to separate their direction as placing electromagnetic that emit magnetic signals to help bird to determine their directions. On the other hand, the lecture states that this solution will also not work as the birds use their ability of deciding their's directions through the earth's magnetic fields for very long distances. He further explains that the bird will not use this ability to decide the short distance between the two cities. Therefore, the lecture says that the bird could determine its direction through its ear and brightness of light.
To sum up, the speaker disagrees with the solutions given by the author of the reading as he found those solution not convincing to his ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
... reading and lecture are both about the birds prevention from getting injured through...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'disagrees'.
Suggestion: disagrees
...ainted part should be small but he also disagree with this idea as he thinks making a sm...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this solution' or 'those solutions'?
Suggestion: this solution; those solutions
...y the author of the reading as he found those solution not convincing to his ideas.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1373.03311258 140% => OK
No of words: 409.0 270.72406181 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71638141809 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37622624784 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452322738386 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8996613778 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.785714286 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2142857143 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160093760125 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612522513393 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511891197701 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864646507214 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560347583472 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.0289183223 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.