Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows. There are, however, several solutions that responsible businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds. One-Way Glass One solution is to replace the regular, clear glass with one-way glass that is transparent in only one direction. The occupants of the building can see out, but birds and others cannot see in. If birds cannot see through a window, they will understand that the glass forms a solid barrier and will not try to fly through it. Colorful Designs A second solution is to paint colorful lines or other designs on regular window glass. For example, a window could have a design of thin stripes painted over the glass. People would still be able to see through the openings in the design where there is no paint, while birds would see the stripes and thus avoid trying to fly through the glass. Architects can be encouraged to include colorful painted patterns on glass as part of the general design of buildings. Magnetic Field The third solution is to create an artificial magnetic field to guide birds away from buildings. Humans use an instrument called a magnetic compass to determine directions—either north, south, east, or west. Bird research has shown that birds have a natural ability to sense Earth’s magnetic fields; this ability works just like a compass, and it helps birds navigate in the right direction when they fly. A building in a bird flight path can be equipped with powerful electromagnets that emit magnetic signals that steer birds in a direction away from the building.
The passage and the lecture are both about glass' buildings affection on the wild birds' flying movement. The birds' disability of distinguishing between the open spaces or buildings' glass, caused lots of harmful issues for birds, this could lead to death in general cases. The author of the passage believes that some solutions should and could be considered to avoid this issue. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the passage. He thinks that none of the article's methods is practical enough.
First of all, the author points out that changing the glass facilities in one direction way will be helpful. Since the birds are not able to see through the one direction glass, they going to analyse it as blocked space. The point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that one-way glass is like a mirror, it can reflex any opposite image like a tree, the sky or the birds themselves. Thus, birds will keep collapsing the glass since they can not understand this images correctly.
Secondly, the author contends that drawing on the glass can be a solution. Glass could be covered by colourfull paints to attract birds' attention, this paints should leave some empty spaces in order to keep the people vision. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He clarifies that birds will try to pass or fly throw the open spaces on the glass, Furthermore, the painting will affect the lightness on the rooms which will make it darker.
Finally, the article states that we could direct and guide the birds away from the glass by using a magnetic field. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that birds use her magnetic ability just during its long distances between the cities or during its emigration. Moreover, birds use its eyes and lights to fly for short distances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...ge and the lecture are both about glass buildings affection on the wild birds flying move...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
... on the wild birds flying movement. The birds disability of distinguishing between th...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s could lead to death in general cases. The author of the passage believes that som...
^^^
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ould be considered to avoid this issue. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in general, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84158415842 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38125158585 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547854785479 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0810659457 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2941176471 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268685874212 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832246949854 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748559733335 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158268270073 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395608237065 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.