The reading passage talks about globalization and its benefits to nations by explaining about cheaper production, healthy economical competitions and mutual reliance between countries. However, the lecturer casts doubt about these advantages by providing reasons how global market negatively affects nations and how cheaper productions has effects on a country.
To begin with, the reading passage says that the competition, created by world trade, among countries keeps the products' quality high and costs in affordable state. The author goes on that the competition forces the nations to produce high quality goods to keep the global business stable, at the same time that controls the cost inflation. However, the lecturer posts that there is a danger hidden in global market and delves deeper to explain this with following example. To clarify the effect of global market's recession, he uses the incident of 2008 recession that happened in US, which affected many European countries and other nations around the world.
In addition, the passage supports that global economy encourages the developing nations, where the production cost is cheaper, and fosters those nations' economy growth. The authors backs his point with the example of present Southeast Asia's present stable economy status by highlighting it's citizens better lifestyle. The lecturer disagrees with this point and explains that one nation's cheaper labour cost affects another nation's job market. He gives example of the workers laid off scenario that happened in US because of the TV manufacturing shift to Mexico where the labour cost is very low.
Finally, the lecturer goes on saying his suspicion of author's statement about environmental damage control over globalization. The lecturer tells that there is no significant environmental damage control recorded because of the global economy. Instead, he says that globalization causes more damage to the environment and cheaper production is gained by damaging environments in many cases. In summary, the lecturer strongly disagrees with the author's claims by explaining the above reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...tion cost is cheaper, and fosters those nations economy growth. The authors backs his p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'back'.
Suggestion: back
...ose nations economy growth. The authors backs his point with the example of present S...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one nation', 'a nation', or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: one nation; a nation; nations
...grees with this point and explains that one nations cheaper labour cost affects another nat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, in addition, in summary, in many cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5900621118 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73100582367 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552795031056 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.990186531 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0281816966617 0.272083759551 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0110920462137 0.0996497079465 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0178491588184 0.0662205650399 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0194265582211 0.162205337803 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121506760428 0.0443174109184 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.