How humans can help birds to do not hit with the glass windows.
The reading and the lecturer are both about how humans can change the design of the glass, which is using for the windows in modern architecture to help the birds to do not crash with. The author of the readings feels that birds cannot recognize the glass windows, and people should discover some solutions. The lecturer challenged the claim made by the author. He says that all of these ways are not effective for this issue.
To begin with, the reading states that One-way glass is useful to transparent in just one direction. Also, the article says that if birds cannot see through the window, they will change their way. This specific solution is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that One-way glass is similar to the mirror. Moreover, the birds cannot understand the difference between the natural air and the mirror. As a result, they will hit the glass windows.
Secondly, the author posits that painted windows a good solution for this matter. In the article, it is stated that individuals could still be able to watch outside. The lecturer, however, rebuts on this by mentioning that birds perceive to do this. Additionally, he elaborates on this by bringing up that people have to make small windows which can affect the room to be darker.
Finally, the author states that artificial magnetic will help and guide birds to get away from the buildings. It is also said that birds have a specific sense that they can navigate their ways to the destination. The lecturer, have an opposite idea to the author. He says that humans can find their ways by some facilities which are invented, but birds will use their eyes and senses to transport from a city to another place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... people should discover some solutions. The lecturer challenged the claim made by t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78082191781 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40629169596 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513698630137 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7268038455 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5555555556 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306470326402 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840581724975 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995203401749 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178712372122 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935144202639 0.0443174109184 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.3589403974 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.