Humans have been battling the tropical disease malaria since at least the late fourth century B.C. This debilitating and deadly disease is actually a parasite which reproduces in humans and is spread through the saliva of mosquitoes when they suck blood from humans. While there is still no cure for malaria, there are three main strategies that we hope will lead to the eradication of this disease which kills nearly half a million people around the world each year.
The first strategy is to fight the malaria parasite itself by treating patients with powerful prescription medicines. Patients are tested to determine which strain of the malaria parasite is present, as different areas of the world have different strains of the parasite. Then, an effective medicine is administered to combat the symptoms of the infection.
The second strategy is to kill the mosquitoes that transfer the parasite to humans. Killing the adult mosquitoes using chemical sprays is a common option, but the larvae of the mosquitoes can also be killed where they develop, in pools of warm, still water. These larvae can be killed using chemicals, but another popular approach is to release fish into the water that prey on the larvae such as guppies to eat the larvae before they mature into adults.
The third strategy is called the sterile insect technique. "Sterile" means the insect cannot reproduce. This strategy involves breeding and hatching millions of mosquitoes, sterilizing the males with low-level gamma rays, and then releasing them into the wild population. Females that mate with the sterile males produce eggs which do not hatch, and this causes the mosquitoes to die out. This strategy has been effective in wiping out a number of insect pests including the screw-worm and several types of fruit flies.
The article and lecture both deals with the concept of malaria disease and its eradication methods. Whilst, the author thinks that, still if there is no any cure for malaria, there can be some strategies to lower their population and support his opinion through three specific strategies. However, Lecturer rebuts the authors each strategies. And further weakens the strategies by stating the flaws in their effectiveness.
First of all, writer claims that treating the malarial patients with the powerful prescribed drugs can help to control the disease. Furthermore, it is stated in the article that identifying the strain of parasite of malaria and using the effective drugs can combat the disease. In contrast, the lecturer argues that, only there are few drugs which are found to be effective to malaria but the malarial parasite has ability to gain resistance to such drugs which are ultimately making them ineffective. Additionally, he exemplified by giving an example of drug called chloroquine , further adds that the drug was effective previously but now the parasite has gain the resistance against it.
Secondly, the author mentions that killing the mosquito that transfer the parasite to human body can be a effective strategy. On top of that, he adds that spraying chemicals to the habitat of mosquito can decimate them completely. However, the lecturer call this argument into question by saying that the population of the mosquitoes is enormous, so to kill them completely is not possible. further, he remarks that it holds same in the case of larva present in water and clarify that it is not possible to destroy them completely.
Finally, the writer asserts that sterile insect technique can be the one of the bests strategy to eradicate disease. He further adds that, such sterile male population would mate and female would produce the unfertilized egg which can help in controlling population. As opposed to author, the lecturer holds that male mosquitoes which are sterile by using gamma rays are found to be less attractive to female mosquitoes, which leads to less infertile eggs and population cannot be fettered.
Coming to end, author and lecturer both holds contradictory view on one another on topic of malaria eradication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...e author thinks that, still if there is no any cure for malaria, there can be some...
^^
Line 2, column 579, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng an example of drug called chloroquine , further adds that the drug was effectiv...
^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nsfer the parasite to human body can be a effective strategy. On top of that, he ...
^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Further
...o kill them completely is not possible. further, he remarks that it holds same in the c...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bests'' or 'best's'?
Suggestion: bests'; best's
... insect technique can be the one of the bests strategy to eradicate disease. He furth...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, in contrast, first of all, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1373.03311258 138% => OK
No of words: 364.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2032967033 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76745420509 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 419.366225166 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5617449603 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0953949348311 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328122894781 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031514160225 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505326767871 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179056113049 0.0443174109184 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.