The reading and the lecture are both about Malaria that transfer by mosquitoes through sucking human blood which leads to killing an enormous number of people annually. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about the effective ways to dispose of these mosquitoes. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that none of these methods can completely diminish mosquitoes. First and foremost, the author of the reading states fighting malaria by providing patients with potent medicines by determining the strain of malaria. The article mentions that the next step is to know the most effective medicine and then provide them to people. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that there are medicines but no drugs till now for malaria because malaria gains immunity toward these cures. Additionally, he points out that if the next step did not work, so all medicines will be useless. Secondly, the author states killing mosquitoes using chemical sprays. In the article, it is said that the problem with the larvae so by emitting fish into the water may die. Again, the speaker specifically addresses this point when he states it is not a great idea because the spray is easy but the adult mosquitoes can fly, so they will not die at all. He goes on to say that the same problem will happen with larvae because fish will not reach all of them. Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting using the Sterile insect strategy by catching male mosquitoes and then exhibiting them to gamma rays, so the eggs of the females will not hatch. Not surprisingly, the professor takes issue with this claim by contending that it is an effective way but the problem the captured males will not mate as wild mosquitoes. He notes that the result the males will not mate enough.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85849056604 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51075177012 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550314465409 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0702204462 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5625 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968080315277 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303981798375 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048181101103 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968080315277 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.