Humans have been battling the tropical disease malaria since at least the late fourth century B.C. This debilitating and deadly disease is actually a parasite which reproduces in humans and is spread through the saliva of mosquitoes when they suck blood from humans. While there is still no cure for malaria, there are three main strategies that we hope will lead to the eradication of this disease which kills nearly half a million people around the world each year.
The first strategy is to fight the malaria parasite itself by treating patients with powerful prescription medicines. Patients are tested to determine which strain of the malaria parasite is present, as different areas of the world have different strains of the parasite. Then, an effective medicine is administered to combat the symptoms of the infection.
The second strategy is to kill the mosquitoes that transfer the parasite to humans. Killing the adult mosquitoes using chemical sprays is a common option, but the larvae of the mosquitoes can also be killed where they develop, in pools of warm, still water. These larvae can be killed using chemicals, but another popular approach is to release fish into the water that prey on the larvae such as guppies to eat the larvae before they mature into adults.
The third strategy is called the sterile insect technique. "Sterile" means the insect cannot reproduce. This strategy involves breeding and hatching millions of mosquitoes, sterilizing the males with low-level gamma rays, and then releasing them into the wild population. Females that mate with the sterile males produce eggs which do not hatch, and this causes the mosquitoes to die out. This strategy has been effective in wiping out a number of insect pests including the screw-worm and several types of fruit flies.
Recently, there has been a ton of debate as to the effectiveness to eradicate malaria. More specifically, In regards to thr passage the writer puts forth the idea that there are three processes we can eradicate malaria. However, the lecturer is quick to point out that there are some serious flaws in the writer's claims. In facts, the professor believes these three processes are not effective,and address, in details, the troube with each point made in the reading text.
Firstly, the author of the reading states that by using prescription medicine we can reduce malaria. Some professionals , however , in the same field stands in firm opposition to this claims. In the listening , for example, the lecture claims that these madicine only effective for specific species. He goes on to say that new specises are not killed by those medicine.
Secondly, one group of scholar represented by the writer thinks that by killing the mosquito that transfer the malaria we can eradicate it. Of course, though , not all experts in this sector belives this is accurate. Again the professor specifically address this point when he states that in this process the most of the mosquito fly away .Additionall he notes that fishes and other species can be affected.
Finally, the author wraps his argument by positing that by sterilize the male mosquito we can eradicate the malaria. Not surprisingly, the professor takes issue by contending that these sterilised male can not mate with the femail mosquitos and the mating ability of these mosquito also deleted.
To sum up, both the witer and l;ecturer halds conflicting view about the effectiveness to eradicate malaria. It is clear that, they will have trouble in finding common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...o eradicate malaria. More specifically, In regards to thr passage the writer puts forth the i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
... these three processes are not effective,and address, in details, the troube with ea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e can reduce malaria. Some professionals , however , in the same field stands in f...
^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ce malaria. Some professionals , however , in the same field stands in firm opposi...
^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...same field stands in firm opposition to this claims. In the listening , for example,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...osition to this claims. In the listening , for example, the lecture claims that th...
^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this medicine' or 'those medicines'?
Suggestion: this medicine; those medicines
...say that new specises are not killed by those medicine. Secondly, one group of scholar repr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...a we can eradicate it. Of course, though , not all experts in this sector belives ...
^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rocess the most of the mosquito fly away .Additionall he notes that fishes and oth...
^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionall
...cess the most of the mosquito fly away .Additionall he notes that fishes and other species ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this mosquito' or 'these mosquitoes', 'these mosquitos'?
Suggestion: this mosquito; these mosquitoes; these mosquitos
...ail mosquitos and the mating ability of these mosquito also deleted. To sum up, both the wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, in fact, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11888111888 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70882645896 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573426573427 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1898975402 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0996071738888 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345376177449 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272315100024 0.0662205650399 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0573527783017 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256067126216 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.