The reading and the lecture are both about Malaria that trasfer by mosquitoes through suck human's blood which leads to kill enormous number of people annualy. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about the effective ways to disposal these mosquitoes. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that none of these methods can completly diminish mosquitoes.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states fighting malaria throgh providing patients potent medicines by determine the strain if the malaria. The article mentions that the next step is by know the most effective medicine then provide them to people. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that there are medicines but no drugs till now for the malaria because malaria gain immunity toward these cures. Additionally, he points out that if the next step did not work, so all medicines will be useless.
Secondly, the author states killing mosquitoes using chemical sprays . In the article, it is said that the problem with the larvae so by emitting fish to the water may die. Again, the speaker specifically addresses this point when he states it is not a great ideabecaue spray is easy but the adults mosquitoes can fly, so they will not dey at all. He goes on to say that the same proble will happend with larvae because fish will not reach all of them.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that using Sterile insect strategy by catching male mosquitoes then exhibit them to gamma rays, so the eggs of the females will not hatch . Not surprisingly, the professor takes issue with this calim by contending that it is an effective way but the problem the captured males will not mate as wild mosquitoes, so damage to . He notes that the result the males will not mate enough.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...killing mosquitoes using chemical sprays . In the article, it is said that the pro...
^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...o the eggs of the females will not hatch . Not surprisingly, the professor takes i...
^^
Line 7, column 389, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ot mate as wild mosquitoes, so damage to . He notes that the result the males will...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89556962025 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50185807662 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7426368669 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6875 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0983077251543 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308701137874 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496837393096 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582801762637 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298841629501 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.