The lecture and the passage are both about a teenager girl's portrait whether belongs to Jane Austen or not. The author of the reading believes that the girl is Jane Austen. The professor casts doubt on claims made by the author. SHe offers plausible explanations that the picture do not depict her.
First of all, the author argues that in 1882, the family of Austin permitted to use her letters to illustrate the portrait. The article mentions that the family endorsed the claim that Jane Austin was portrayed in the artwork. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She points out that since she was deceased many years ago, any family member had never seen her. Therefore, recognition might be a fault.
Secondly, the writer suggests that the facial appearance in the sketch of Cassandra bears resemblance to the one in the portrait. In the reading, it is said that although Jane Austen was an adult in the sketch, she looked like the teen in the work of art. The speaker, however, rebuts this by mentioning many girls in the family were teenagers and similar to Jane. She elaborates on this by bringing up the point that her family were large, and any girl relative might be depicted (For example Mary Ann Campion).
Finally, the author posits that the design of the portrait belongs to the renowned painter, Ozias Humphrey. Moreover, according to the article, as Austen's family were rich, they could afford to recruit him. On the contrary, the lecturer's position is
claiming that the style is not Humphrey's and the painting attributes to William Legg. She notes a stamp on the portrait helped to indicate a possible date of the artwork. When Legg started selling canvas, Jane was not a teenager, however, she was 27 years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'girls'' or 'girl's'?
Suggestion: girls'; girl's
...d the passage are both about a teenager girls portrait whether belongs to Jane Austen...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... believes that the girl is Jane Austen. The professor casts doubt on claims made by...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84666666667 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4289915603 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563333333333 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0455687107 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.7777777778 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175316509291 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609990658745 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09200864339 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104223710779 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732186983769 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.