Importance of News
The passage and lecture hold two opposing views about the importance of following news. The reading passage proposes three possible reasons for the benefits of the news that they are very good for people. However, the lecturer seems to casts doubts on the elucidations explained by the author. Believing that news is confusing, the professor finds readings proofs unconvincing and she disproves each reason mentioned in the text, specifically.
To begin with, the first reason described by the author regarding the fact that news induces our mind and emotion. However, the speaker finds this statement debatable and refute it. He asserts that news encourages a bad part of our mind and it can be dangerous. Furthermore, she says that the news is not good for our brains. Consequently, we should not look news many times.
Secondly, it is proposed in the reading passage that news is irrelevant that caused some problems. This point is rebutted by the lecturer and she claims that although some news may be irrelevant we can find our favorite genre. Also, we can find some new areas for tracking news about that area. As a result of finding good and new topics, we can learn more about them.
Finally, whereas the author states the idea that news is a waste of time, the professor disproves this belief by explaining that we can save our time by watching the news. By news information, we can have more free time and spend it on other activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'cast'.
Suggestion: cast
... people. However, the lecturer seems to casts doubts on the elucidations explained by...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, whereas, as for, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84274193548 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56436079363 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540322580645 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0054540947 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0666666667 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333126626031 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11731330514 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802671730617 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200949938506 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463738939036 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.