integrated essay TPO16
The article states that scientific (science) of archaeology have (has) a problem in Britain and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the archaeology have (has) a good condition in all field(s) based on a novel regulation and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading states that plenty of priceless artifacts ruin (were ruined) by construction project(s). The professor refutes this point by saying that locations that builders attempt to build new buildings should be analyze (d) by archaeologists until they recognize archaeological worth of the locations. Hence, if the locations consist of precious artifacts, they (would) conserve those location(s) by helping of government and builders.
Second, the article claims that archaeologists believe that research budget of archaeology is insufficient by government. However, the professor says that based of new regulation, the whole research expenses of archaeologists should be paid by construction companies so they don’t have any financial problem and do their researches exceedingly better than previous situations.
Third, the reading claims that archaeologists don’t have ample opportunities to work in their proficiency. The lecture opposes this point by saying that the archaeologists have abundant opportunities for paid work due to new regulation in Britain. Consequently, the number of professional archaeologists have increased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'analyzed'?
Suggestion: analyzed
...ttempt to build new buildings should be analyze d by archaeologists until they recogniz...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97129186603 5.08290768461 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36941318577 2.5805825403 131% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564593301435 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0549703751 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.8 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200085391052 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793490976445 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281265362464 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118033435136 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168410196719 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.2367328918 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.