integrated essay TPO17
In the reading material, the author raises three strong arguments to support his claim that in the past century, the steady growth of the human poulation and increase in agriculture have caused much harm to wildlife and number of birds in the United States will necessarity decline. The professor, however, disputes those reasons one by one and finds the not convincing ata ll. she adds all the reasons in the readind are not convincing.
Initially, the article states that as hyman population continue to expand bird's natural habitats will continue to disappear. The professor refutes this point by saying that nowedays there are lots of habitats and large habitats are so pervasive, furthermore, some complain about increased habitats and on the othe hand some bird's habitats shirink and others growth.
Secondly, the article posits that agricultral activities must increase to keep pace with the growing human population. The lecturer, yet, declares that less land used by agriculter and it dose not impact on bird's population and new more product af crops will exceed bird's population.
Thirdly, chemical pesticides will increased as human settlements expand and agricultural field increased. The professor debunks this idea by explaining that pesticides nowedays are not harmful to pets, insects on the ground that new pesticides emerged and birds that eat this insects never affected anothe reason which is worth mentioning is groeing trend in the past restrected crups and now we could see that this pesticides heve less harm at birds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doses'?
Suggestion: doses
...hat less land used by agriculter and it dose not impact on birds population and new ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...ion. Thirdly, chemical pesticides will increased as human settlements expand and agricul...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...w pesticides emerged and birds that eat this insects never affected anothe reason wh...
^^^^
Line 4, column 411, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...trected crups and now we could see that this pesticides heve less harm at birds.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29268292683 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63601509543 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.4372212619 49.2860985944 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.666666667 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451922935395 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165285462524 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110037217124 0.0662205650399 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243307492678 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288379353902 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.