integrated essay TPO28
The lecture mainly contradicts the information given in the reading passage stating that the Peary Robert reached the North Pole whereas the lecture says that the arguments presented in the reading are not convincing. There are various points discussed in the lecture to cast the doubts in the reading passage.
Firstly, the speaker tells about the reliability of the Geographic Society Committee about the Peary's claim. The speaker says that the major members of that committee are Peary's close friend so that financially support him in the trip. Furthermore, the committee decision lasted only two days and this limited time does not guarantee a reliable decision. For these reasons, the reading claim is not trustworthy.
Secondly, the author says that another explorer named Tom Avery had a trek similar to Peary's trek in terms of the distance and had been done less than 37 days as Peary did. On the contrary, the speaker says the conditions in two trips are too different. Because, unlike the Peary trip condition, Avery carried the much less weight and faced with in favorable weather condition.
Thirdly, the author states that the photographs taken by Peary at the North Pole verify his history, since the position of the Sun estimated through evaluation the shadows in the pictures is based on the natural rule. However, the lecture rebuts that statement by pointing out that the quality of those pictures is poor due to this fact that they were taken by the primitive camera and seem to be unclear after about a hundred years. Therefore, the measurement by means of those photos could not be accurate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast the doubts in the reading passage. Firstly, the speaker tells about the rel...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the reading claim is not trustworthy. Secondly, the author says that another e...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with in favorable weather condition. Thirdly, the author states that the phot...
^^^
Line 7, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of those photos could not be accurate.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03717472119 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50348494683 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576208178439 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7192865074 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.916666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31186154947 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093823481794 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768385521064 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162775336127 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149813728413 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.