Integrated TPO 22
The reading and the listening have a conflict of opinions with regard to ethanol fuel. The writer believes that ethanol fuel holds unsuitable alternative for gasoline, while the lecturer claims that passage state is not convincing and disputes those ideas presented in the passage with several proofs.
First of all, the author asserts that the ethanol fuel would not assist to fix global warming problem. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that augmented of ethanol fuel does not adversely affect the environment. In other words, cultivating plants to produce ethanol fuel not only would not ascend the greenhouse gases but also simply compensate disadvantages of burning such gasoline fuel effects on the atmosphere.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that the more withdrawing ethanol fuel from plants, the more consuming of plants as animal foods will increase. On the contrary, the professor underlies the fact that using plants as ethanol fuel would not decrease the sources of animal foods as long as he believes that there are a few parts of plants which go on not eaten by animals. Consequently, producing ethanol fuel does not interfere with the animal food; besides, it will no longer diminish the supplies of plants for other uses.
Finally, the reading argues that ethanol fuel cannot compete with gasoline in terms of price and will cost higher than it. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that extra demanding of ethanol fuel would climb the production. Subsequently, as a general rule, further accessibility of ethanol fuel will dramatically drop the price of it by 40%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asoline fuel effects on the atmosphere. Furthermore, the reading passage holds t...
^^^
Line 4, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amatically drop the price of it by 40%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, so, while, in contrast, first of all, in other words, on the contrary, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16917293233 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63995712504 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548872180451 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0582726465 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5454545455 7.06452816374 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458839055249 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189119735421 0.0996497079465 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337959583702 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283867539722 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327624903633 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.