Integrated. tpo 26
The article states the ways to save torreya trees and provides three reasons for support. Nonetheless, the professor cast doubts on those ideas and explains that none of the author's reasons are satisfactory and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the author assumes that torreya trees can grow well in the same location in which it thrived for thousands of years. The professor, however, denies this point by stating that it is less likely to be successful because he says that those regions are sharply affected by climate change; those areas became dry due to global warming.
Second, the writer posits that toreyya trees should move to an entirely different location. The professor believes that there are flaws in the writer's argument. he asserts that last time when they moved Block Locust trees, they killed other plants and yielded an unpredictable result.
Finally, the reading passage claims that toreyya would grow well in research centers, but the professor opposes this point by saying that the research center has no capacity to keep these plants. he goes on and says that if they keep these trees in the research center, they can not resist deseases, because they need large and genetically different areas.
To sum up, both the author and the professor have a conflicting view, hence they will have trouble finding common ground in this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...or believes that there are flaws in the writers argument. he asserts that last time whe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...here are flaws in the writers argument. he asserts that last time when they moved ...
^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...r has no capacity to keep these plants. he goes on and says that if they keep thes...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, well, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0480349345 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35403178549 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624454148472 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2471468007 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848732449235 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328981161165 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0238185063278 0.0662205650399 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0465196383235 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170343922658 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.