Integrated Writing 11
The reading and listening materials have a debate on the possible identity of the Pearl Poet. The writer comes up with three hypotheses, which are all contradicted by the following lecture.
Firstly, the writer claims that the Pearl Poet was John Massey because of the place he has lived in and his handwriting which is the same as the manuscript of the Pearl Poet’ poems. However, the speaker casts doubt on it by saying that books were reproduced by copying in the 14th century. Consequently, the manuscripts might not be the original documents written by the author, but made by professional copiers. If things went like this, the same handwriting could be explained by the fact that the poems were copied by the same person.
Secondly, the author argues that the poem was authorized by Hugh due to the shared character in their poems and the identical use of alliteration, while the lecture views this issue from an opposite angle. According to the professor, in spite of the similarities above, they have different dialogues of English. In that age, people in different regions spoke different variety of English. Correspondingly, the authors must come from different areas of England because of their different dialogues.
Thirdly, the passage states that the four poems were supposed to be written by a few different authors from the same region. On the contrary, in accordance with the professor, this claim does not hold water. It is because the similarities among these poems go beyond the same place mentioned in them. In addition to that, the four poems also have same vocabularies which are uncommon words used in two or more poems. It is unlikely that the same unique words could be exerted by different poets coincidentally. As a result, it is a strong indication of the fact that they were written by a single one author.
To sum up, the writer’s statements were totally refuted by the professor.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, incidentally, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, in addition, as a result, in spite of, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99690402477 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81189553694 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541795665635 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.954783693 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9411764706 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4705882353 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.