24-W1
The reading passage points out three evidences that indicate the existence of actually tissue in
dinosaur fossil. However, the professor doubts the accuracy of these evidences. In fact, he offers
some alternative explanations for the substances found in the fossil.
First and foremost, he challenges the existence of blood vessels. Instead, he points out that
bacteria may occupy the hollows inside the bones. Therefore, it is highly possible that the soft
substance in the branching channels of the bone is the moist residue of bacteria, rather than blood
vessels of the dinosaur.
Moreover, the professor casts doubt about the red substance in sphere, which according to the
reading passage is the remain of red blood cells. In fact, the professor claims that this red
substance was also found in some other animals, which lived in the same place but had no red
blood vessels at all. The professor argues that the sphere can be pieces of red minerals.
Additionally, the professor doubts the existence of collagen in the fossil. On the contrary to the
reading passage, he points out that the earliest collagen that has ever found is in fossils 100000
ago. It is unlikely for collagen to last for more than 70 million years. As a result, the professor
suggests that the collagen may come from recent sources, such as the skin of researchers who
handed the fossil.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 20, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ch according to the reading passage is the remain of red blood cells. In fact, the profes...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, in fact, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10917030568 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56144713441 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532751091703 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4570766643 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 15.0 4.09492273731 366% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.