Integrated writing-TPO 11
The lecture and the reading passage are both regarding the issue that recent people read far less literature than in the past. The reading passage offers three effects of reading less literature. On the other hand, the lecturer rebuts all the perspectives presented in the passage.
To begin with, the author believes that literature provides us important intellectual stimulation, and without it, we might miss out on benefits. While the lecturer does not think it that way, she believes that instead of literature, many other high-quality books, such as, science and technological books, can also bring the readers dozens of knowledge.
Second, the author considers that we turn to other entertainment other than reading literature, and then it would lower our level of culture. For example, we might watch TV, videos or surf the Internet in our leisure time. However, the lecturer contends that there are plenty of means to gain knowledge. Due to the changes of culture, cultural values may come out in other forms, like music, music, and so on.
Third, the author thinks that many contemporary talented writers lack the audience, which leads to less investment in literature from publishers. On top of that, the lecturer says that it would not be the readers' faults. It is all because sometimes the writers create something difficult to understand for readers.
To sum up, the lecture and the reading passage are totally different in this issue from many perspectives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, third, while, for example, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17083333333 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6968313454 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2642633034 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4615384615 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4615384615 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340039546209 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111903657333 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095003089157 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171827460797 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749238666584 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.