Integreted TPO 21
In the reading, the author claims that planting trees which are genetically modified have lots of advantages by pointing out three reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer totally repudiates the claim and presents some evidence to the contrary.
First, the author argues that genetically modified trees are more durable than nature trees. Conversely, the lecturer refutes this point by explaining that these modified trees have been designed uniformly and for a specific condition like a kind of climate or pest. So, they are not resistance to new pests or other poor climate conditions. While nature trees might survive in more variety climate conditions or pests even low numbers of them.
Second, the reading passage holds the view that planting genetically modified trees create more profits due to they not only are hardier but also provides more products. However, the speaker casts doubt on this point. She posits that companies can charge tree farmers more for their seeds. In addition, after growing the trees, when farmers want to collect seeds and plant new trees, they should pay the cost for every planting. As in turns out, cultivating genetically modified trees is more costly.
Finally, the reading states that by using genetically modified trees, native trees would not overexploit as woods. On the contrary, the professor disagrees with this reason. According to her, genetically modified trees grow very aggressively in their environment. Therefore, they surpass in the competition with native trees for natural resources like sunlight, water, soil nutrients. It is evident that eventually, they will remove the native species of the trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irst, the author argues that genetically modified trees are more durable than nat...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'in addition', 'kind of', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243421052632 0.261695866417 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.157894736842 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0690789473684 0.0723426182421 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0888157894737 0.0435111971325 204% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0361842105263 0.0277247811725 131% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118421052632 0.128828473217 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0592105263158 0.0370669169778 160% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61109794519 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0164473684211 0.0208969081088 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00657894736842 0.00154638098197 425% => OK
Determiners: 0.0888157894737 0.128158765124 69% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0164473684211 0.0158828679856 104% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00657894736842 0.0114777025283 57% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1723.0 1645.83664459 105% => OK
No of words: 268.0 271.125827815 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.42910447761 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.414179104478 0.374372842146 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.320895522388 0.287516216867 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216417910448 0.187439937562 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134328358209 0.113142543107 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61109794519 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.539623497131 112% => OK
Word variations: 64.8525033716 53.8517498576 120% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.75 21.7502111507 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4764030771 49.3711431718 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6875 132.220823453 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 21.7502111507 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.878197800319 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 48.8395522388 50.5018328374 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.48837209302 1.90840788429 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.605961907449 0.549887131256 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0890516312055 0.142949733639 62% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0685059310529 0.0787303798458 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.511876932586 0.631733273073 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12955293312 0.139662658121 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227452869157 0.266732575781 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871616260362 0.103435571967 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.327548727935 0.414875509568 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0620291515965 0.0530846634433 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.423919769338 0.40443939384 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305107529164 0.0528353158467 58% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.