internet is good or bad
The reading and lecture are both about the Internet. The author of reading feels that the Internet makes people dumper. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the author. He is of the opinion that the Internet makes people more smarter. The lecturer cast doubt on the main point made in reading by providing three reasons.
To begin with, the author argues that Internet makes us less adventurous, more cautious and less likely to define ourselves by our own experience; moreover, Internet put other people's ideas and experience perpetually in our fingertips. This argument is challenged by lecturer. He claims that Internet makes the people smarter; furthermore, he mentions that the Internet increases the IQ of every person by ten as compared to the IQ of people where there is no option of the Internet.
Secondly, the reading states that Internet has had adverse effects on our short-term attention spans and our ability to focus on a task; nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this by mentioning that due to internet small kids are able to solve their school task on their own and without the help of teachers. Whereas, in past where there is no internet kids are more dependent on Teachers.
Finally, the author posits that the Internet has often removed the need for critical thinking and creative problems- in everyday situations. Howbeit, the lecturer, believes that due to the usage of Internet humans become more critical as compared to past where there was no internet. He feels now humans find the solution of each and every critical question on their own and without the need of others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... that the Internet makes people dumper. The lecturer challenges the claim made by t...
^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'smarter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: smarter
... opinion that the Internet makes people more smarter. The lecturer cast doubt on the main po...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 307, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r own and without the help of teachers. Whereas, in past where there is no internet kid...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st where there was no internet. He feels now humans find the solution of each and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07089552239 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57264687006 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492537313433 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.4217848009 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.538461538 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214349038193 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882398867947 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631861519755 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141604467647 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230031543554 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.