Jane Austen
Both the passage and the lecture discuss whether a girl on a painting is Janes Austen or not. According to the author, the girl on the painting is Austen for some reasons. The lecturer, however, does not agree with the author`s point of view.
The first reason the author says that, Austen`s family let portrait to be used in an edition of her letters, which means that her family accept that the girl on the painting is Jane. Hovewer, the lecturer disputes this idea. She says that family members did not see the portrait with their own eyes.
According to the author, the girl on the portrait looks like Austen in the Austen`s sister, Cassandra`s drawing. The lecturer, on the other hand, says that the girl on the portrait can also be a relative of Austen. The speaker gives information about the experts that claim the girl on the portrait is actually a distant niece of Austen that resemles her.
The author says that, the style of the portait indicates that a professional society portait painter did the painting when Austen was a teenager. That painter was active when Austen was as old as the girl in the painting. The speaker, though, says that it could be becuase of the style but, a stamp beyond the portrait shows that it was done by another painter. Actually, Austen was older than the girl on the painting at the time of the portait being made.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bers did not see the portrait with their own eyes. According to the author, t...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t niece of Austen that resemles her. The author says that, the style of the port...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, look, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72427983539 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49608747341 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493827160494 0.540411800872 91% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0627013068 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3076923077 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290927161923 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113777988491 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956728661189 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187612109108 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573304351998 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.