The author and the lecturer debate on identitiy of Jane Austen. The author of the reading passage provides three hypothesis that Cassandra depicted Jane Austen, while the lecturer opposes each point considering it unconvincing and challenges all points mentioned in the text.
To begin with, the author claims that Jane Austen's family gave a permission to portrait her and they recognized the identity of Austen. In contrast, the lecturer argues that the portrait was made in 1882, at that time, Austen was dead for 17 years. Therefore, none of the family members saw her, so they were not certain about portrait was Jane Austen's or not.
Secondly, the article asserts that another portrait of Austen made by Cassandra was resemble to teenage Austen. However, the lecturer calls this argument into question by stating that Austen had a large extended family. Moreover, many female cousins looked similar to Austen. Thus, many experts believed that in a Cassandra's portrait, the girl was Austen's distance niece.
Finally, the author notes that even though portrait was not dated, Ozias Humphery who was a professional painter hiered by Auten's family was active when she was teenager. On the other hand, as opposed to the author, the lecturer holds that a stamp on black canvas was sold by willium lag. Meanwhile, Austen was young, he did not sell stamps in London, but when she was 27 years old, he used to be active. As a result, the painting would not be depicated young Jane Austen.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The author and the lecturer debate on id...
^^^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hypothesis' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'.
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
...r of the reading passage provides three hypothesis that Cassandra depicted Jane Austen, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nges all points mentioned in the text. To begin with, the author claims that Ja...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout portrait was Jane Austens or not. Secondly, the article asserts that anoth...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'resembled'.
Suggestion: resembled
...ortrait of Austen made by Cassandra was resemble to teenage Austen. However, the lecture...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the girl was Austens distance niece. Finally, the author notes that even thou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ult, the painting would not be depicated young Jane Austen.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97590361446 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42429278948 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598393574297 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.776051679 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3076923077 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120984187197 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573678098982 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330612441897 0.0662205650399 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829089883122 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296543343152 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The author and the lecturer debate on id...
^^^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hypothesis' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'.
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
...r of the reading passage provides three hypothesis that Cassandra depicted Jane Austen, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nges all points mentioned in the text. To begin with, the author claims that Ja...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout portrait was Jane Austens or not. Secondly, the article asserts that anoth...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'resembled'.
Suggestion: resembled
...ortrait of Austen made by Cassandra was resemble to teenage Austen. However, the lecture...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the girl was Austens distance niece. Finally, the author notes that even thou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ult, the painting would not be depicated young Jane Austen.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97590361446 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42429278948 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598393574297 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.776051679 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3076923077 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120984187197 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573678098982 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330612441897 0.0662205650399 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829089883122 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296543343152 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.