Some people think that if companies prohibit sending emails to staff on weekends or during other times out of office hours, staff dissatisfaction with their companies will decrease. Others think that will not reduce the overall dissatisfaction among staff. What is your opiniom?
Communication is a better way to exchange your thoughts. Some people believe that in order to get an update with the information of the company, the employee should get in touch with the manager. I personally acquiesce that if companies stop giving emails during holidays, it will not cause any satisfactory issue in the team. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in this essay.
First, peoples get rid of worry, and they can enjoy free time happily. Employees need some break from the daily working hurdles, but they cannot directly approach to the manager, even if this change will happen in the company, the employees are happier than anyone else. When I was work for Microsoft, there was a policy that sending emails and meetings must be held during office hours, so I spent my weekends well. When I joined Amazon, there was no policy, and I got plenty of emails anytime. Therefore, I am mostly involved in the work and even not give enough time to myself. I can certainly see that if companies decided not to send emails, it would benefit employees, and they can enjoy their time on weekends with delight.
Secondly, no work can hold due to this decision because employees should know their responsibilities, so they manage to complete it on weekdays. My brother works for Intel, and he has a more workload than my company, so he plans his weekly schedule. Therefore, he has enough time on the weekend. Moreover, sometimes, he gets a call on Sunday. The manager or team member, whoever calls him, also apologizes to disturb him, and it gets stronger bonds between the employees or manager. As you can see, this policy does not change in good value, by the way, the worker should know more about their responsibilities.
In a nutshell, companies not send an email, which gets free hours from the load, but it increases the responsibilities to finish the work within the working hours, so it does not have a trust issue between the team.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Communication is a better way to exchang...
^^
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asons which I will explore in this essay First peoples get rid of worry and they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 729, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...njoy their time on weekends with delight Secondly no work can hold due to this de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d know more about their responsibilities In a nutshell companies not send an emai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
... In a nutshell companies not send an email which gets free hours from the load but...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not have a trust issue between the team
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i feel, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57848837209 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48305336545 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517441860465 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 344.0 20.1344086022 1709% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1575.0 100.406767564 1569% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 344.0 20.6045352989 1670% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 89.0 5.45110844103 1633% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172016165649 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172016165649 0.076458572812 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114560297943 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508248696705 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 172.1 11.7677419355 1462% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -260.76 58.1214874552 -449% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 135.1 10.1575268817 1330% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.76 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.04 8.01818996416 287% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 10.002688172 550% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 139.6 10.0537634409 1389% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 10.247311828 537% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.