The long-term use of sucralose can cause harm to the immune system, especially in children.
The text and the lecture offer two opposing views about the pros and cons of the consumption of sucralose for humans. While the reading passage lists three disadvantages for the sucralose, the professor repudiates all the given reasons and asserts that the consumption of sucralose is both safe and beneficial for losing weight.
First, the article posits that sucralose causes thymus to shrink, thereby damaging the human's immune system. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this reason by explaining that, in the reading's cited studies, there were no reported harm due to consumption of sucralose, unless they were eaten in large quantities. For example, if the amount of sucralose used by rats was scaled to human's size of body, a human might eat 4000 packets of sucralose per day for a month before its thymus to get damaged. Thus, eating sucralose is not harmful for the immune system.
Next, the author claims that sucralose is a kind of organochlorines which are toxic chemical substances for living creatures. In contrast, the professor elucidates that sucralose is in some ways different from other organochlorines because it is not absorbed by body's tissues, therefore they do not accumulate in the body's tissues. For this reason, their amount never reach the level which can impose risks to the health of a person. Based on this argument, sucralose cannot poison human beings.
Finally, the passage declares that eating sucralose is not such beneficial for losing weight because it keeps people's eagerness for consuming sweet foods. On the other hand, the lecturer rejects this assertion by stating that there is some discrepancies between sucralose and other types of artificial sweeteners. According to the lecturer, sucralose will not break down under the effect of heat, in contrast to other types of artificial sweeteners. For this cause, people can bake cakes and cookies using sucralose, and so they can keep in track with their diets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...safe and beneficial for losing weight. First, the article posits that sucralose...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is not harmful for the immune system. Next, the author claims that sucralose i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sucralose cannot poison human beings. Finally, the passage declares that eatin...
^^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some discrepancies'?
Suggestion: there are some discrepancies
... rejects this assertion by stating that there is some discrepancies between sucralose and other types of ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in contrast, kind of, in contrast to, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17665615142 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68663802238 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567823343849 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1822644989 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.214285714 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193791263413 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797611420351 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775420186402 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113954037684 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681627008202 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.