long lasting friendships or a lot of different friends
Although human is social animal, thus the role of friendships in his life is incontrovertible, there are a lot controversies on how to make friends. While some argue that it is better to have a wide variety of friends, I, personally believe that making deep, durable friendships is far better because one can trust his old friends more, know their habits better, and allocate more time for them.
one of the primary causes is that old friends are trustee. Although in social life, humans are compelled to trust other people in different situations, in hardships, these are only the old friends that can help the individual. While we cannot blame others why they are not coming to aid us in difficult situations, we can focus on making some old friendships to address those problems.
Another aspect to consider is that good friends should be aware of each other's habits. Humans are complicated creatures. Each person has its own thoughts, favorites, and special behaviours. In order to make a relationship, there is a need for friends to know their habits exactly. Then, they realize that if they like those habits or not. As a result, never an action can be misunderstood, and so bother the friend. For example, when two people are friend for a short period of time, say 1 week, may be one of them is addicted to smoke, and the other hates smoking, so they cannot be good friends for each other.
A more persuasive reason is that one should allocate time to his friends. Even though we make friendships mostly because we want to socialize or to have fun, friendships are just like trees, one should look for them, pay attention to them, and provide light, water, and other appropriate conditions for them to grow, thereby he can reach its fruits. When making a friendship, similarly, you should spend time with your friends, listening to their thoughts and their concerns, and even allot time to take actions in their favor or helping them. All of these would not be possible if you have a lot of friends, time is short, indeed.
In conclusion, I prefer to have long-lasting friendships rather than vast, short-term friendships because old friends are more confidant, I am aware of their habits, and I can spend more time with them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etter, and allocate more time for them. one of the primary causes is that old fr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 6, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...nd allocate more time for them. one of the primary causes is that old frien...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...friendships to address those problems. Another aspect to consider is that good ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... when two people are friend for a short period of time, say 1 week, may be one of them is addi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cannot be good friends for each other. A more persuasive reason is that one sho...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lot of friends, time is short, indeed. In conclusion, I prefer to have long-las...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, similarly, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78294573643 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67543577506 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509043927649 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0353973851 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.882352941 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221155116379 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656798706108 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567590472268 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130962180427 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576390644594 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.