By making it easier and quicker to complete international trade and financial transactions, technological advances have led to globalization - the integration of economies and societies around the world. Even critics of globalization acknowledge its positive effects. One of the benefits of a global market is that it offers greater opportunity for people to tap into more and larger markets around the world. This increased market access increases the flow of capital across borders, results in cheaper imports, and also promotes competition among worldwide providers of goods and services, thus leading to greater efficiencies worldwide, since specialization allows people and economies to focus on what they do best. Another advantage of globalization is the rapid spread of knowledge and technology. Direct foreign investment results not only in capital expansion, but also in technical innovation. Knowledge about production methods, management techniques, export markets and economic policies is made available to workers in expanding markets, often in developing countries, who can in turn use this knowledge to expand and improve local businesses. Finally, in a global market, there is a tendency for workers to move from developing countries to developed countries to find better employment opportunities. This means that there is also the potential for newly learned skills to be transferred back to the developing countries from which the workers came, and for wages in these countries to rise. As wages rise and workers become more educated, developing countries experience economic growth, a reduction in poverty, and an increase in consumption, thereby leading to greater economic opportunities for all.
Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they contrast with the points made in the reading.
Both the lecturer and the writer analyze the effects of globalization but their opinions are fundamentally at odds. While the former is more focused on benefits, the ladder discusses only about its drawbacks.
First, the speaker is strongly convinced that this phenomenon has lead to an increase in the economic gap not only between rich and poor country, but also between rich and poor people living in the same country. She believes that one of the main causes of this situation is the deallocation of work forces in poorest country, where workers can be paid less money and can overwork. By contrast, the writer believes that globalization is worthy not only for wealthy country but also for developing ones since the knowledge and the technologies are able to spread worldwide in less time than before.
In addition, the lecturer argue that the globalized world is losing even more its national cultures. As a matter of fact, people from two opposite part of the globe is listening to the same music, wearing the same clothes and eating the same food.
In conclusion, the two opinions presented are completely different. On one side the writer is strongly convinced that no drawbacks are due to globalization, but on the other side the lecturer judges that situation as dramatical for 21th century society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the poorest'.
Suggestion: in the poorest
...tion is the deallocation of work forces in poorest country, where workers can be paid less...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02739726027 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71797300281 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579908675799 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7718207058 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0876973506325 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420800199123 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054241410224 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.053523497711 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295427215392 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.