The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graphs display the quantity of waste generated by three different firms between 2000 and 2015.

Overall, the only company that increased its wastes over the whole period was the third one, which overtook the numbers of the company A, which was dominant in 2000, the first year reported.

In 2000, the company which produced more waste was the A with 12 tonnes, followed by the B and C with approximately 8.5 and 3.6, respectively. However, while these last two companies started growing, the first experienced a gradual decrement to reach a value of 8.5, its lowest point, in 2015. However, at the end of the period analyzed, company A had still the dominance over the company B.

Analyzing the trends of companies A and B over the whole period, we can notice that, even if they are both decrescent, their behaviours are slightly different. While the former experienced a growth over the first 5 years and, after that, began a dramatic drop, the latter begin its fall immediately, in 2000. However, the fall of the first was far more sloped than the second one, which mantained its value more stable.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'A' is left.
Suggestion: the; A
...e company which produced more waste was the A with 12 tonnes, followed by the B and C...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, still, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.828125 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52328027761 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588541666667 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7738874687 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.875 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166948102328 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788025213275 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470535173749 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11088763888 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257581218879 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.