The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information on the variations experienced by three different kind of crimes that took place between 2003 and 2012 in the central area of the city of Newport.
Overall, the number of burglaries has significantly dropped over the years, while the tolls of both car thefts and robberies have remained stable, experiencing only minimal fluctuations compared to the former trend.
In the first year reported in the graph the most common crime was burglary, with a total of 3500 incidents in 365 days. In the following year, this number experienced a slight increase of approximately 250 units to reach a peak at the start of 2004, when it reached the highest value of the chart. After that, it dropped steadily until 2007 when it leveled up at around 1500 cases per year. As a consequence, starting on the second half of 2006 the dominance of burglaries was replaced by car thefts, which were the dominant accidents until 2012.
By contrast, the trends of car thefts and robberies have not changed as significantly. In particular, the former had, on average, 2200 cases, the latter was centered in 600 and their wider variations were of 600 and 400 units, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...riations experienced by three different kind of crimes that took place between 2003 ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while, in particular, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9552238806 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77906902985 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641791044776 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0042780559 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131414558888 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553321923413 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892187494097 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923764982336 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113860955144 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.