In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team.
Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by the decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to "shine", to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team's overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.
The reading and the lecture are talking about the aggregation of people for a new project. The passage provides three supporting ideas in order to bolster its claim for the possible advantages of group participation. However, the professor says, the conglomerate of many people attendance causes disadvantages for the overall project. He refutes each of the reading claim.
First, the article asserts that there are advantages of wider people participation as it entails a lots of expertise, knowledge. But, the lecturer denies this idea. Apart from that he elaborates that some people are in the group exist as a free rider, they are not used to do the required work rather they are ready to get the recognition without their contributions.
Second, the passage states that it is possible to do the work fastly by working in a group because there are a slew of creative ideas and peoples to do the work. However, the narrator refutes this supposition. Conversely, he explains that the completion of group task is slow because in the group the agreement to reach a common goal take more time. Moreover, the group members are waiting for someone attempt first as they are undecided how they move their task?
Third, the written excerpt claims that there is a possibility of someone presence as a voice maker that enables to complete the required task. The point is quite incoherent with the professor idea. On the other hand, he delineates that when, a group member is work from a dominate position than others member have not enough floor to disregard his claims. But, when, the same group is somehow doing badly then every member take the blemish blame equally.
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet The pa 78
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has become a 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: A_PLURAL
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...ider people participation as it entails a lots of expertise, knowledge. But, the lectu...
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'slews'?
... working in a group because there are a slew of creative ideas and peoples to do the...
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'attempts'.
...e group members are waiting for someone attempt first as they are undecided how they mo...
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... that when, a group member is work from a dominate position than others member have not en...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, moreover, second, so, then, third, apart from, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95729537367 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63806943461 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551601423488 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8520869161 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8666666667 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207788957003 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659796891095 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617983058915 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1300267639 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519804930447 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.